6 Comments
User's avatar
Rob Croll's avatar

Thank you for this! I’ve been traveling today and trying to respond to messages from people feeling very concerned about all the inaccurate hype around that article. You saved me from trying to write up an explanation!

Expand full comment
Astrid B's avatar

Love this! & thanks for sharing your prompt.

I had all but given up on AI summaries for studies as I’ve found time and time again it would skip over crucial elements and I was better off just taking notes while I was reading

Expand full comment
Adam Brinegar's avatar

Nice catch — how can a one off 9 student experiment not be the definitive word? :) I think people react to MIT more than anything. But this problem is endemic to the behavioral sciences — useful studies, but they need to be classified differently - eg “positive plausibility probe” or something

Expand full comment
Kyle Stirling's avatar

Better not to "Delve" too deeply into the "Multifaceted Tapestry contaminated word selection -- unless you have some extremely focussed word choice question you need advice on ...

Expand full comment
Constanza's avatar

simplemente, gracias ! jaja

Expand full comment
John Tierney's avatar

Talk to anybody under 30 who attended college; they are perfectly relaxed with things being different. They know there are downsides to algorithms/bubbles/whatever but they also recognise the upsides.

Expand full comment